Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate
(1) why are sponsors of NaMo paying big bucks to paidmediamen to over highlight encounter of 8 SIMI terrorists in Madhya Pradesh? Because that topic saves NaMo from facing questions like "why you havent reduced corruption in police, courts etc".
.
For years, NaMo , Shivraj Chauhad etc were giving excuses that "we can reduce corruption in police to US level or even lower within weeks, but congress at center isnt allowing us to pass the necessary laws !!!". And the excuses have 1% truth because Assembly cant pass a law without approval of PM. And even when assembly does, final signature of Governor is must and Governors will sign ONLY if PM allows.
,
But now BJP has PM and over 2.5 years have passed. And so now NaMo, Shivraj Chauha et al have no excuses left on IMPORTANT questions like "why is cirruption in policemen, courts much much higher than USA?".
.
So sponsors of NaMo are paying big bucks to paidmediamen to cover whole bandwidth with encounter news so that all these relevant shortcomings of NaMo gets supressed
.
,--------------------
.
(2) When in argument with RSS-workers , NaMo-andhbhagats about psuedo-hinduvaad of NaMo, pls cite govt control over temples as FIRST topic and AFTER that cite other topics such as inaction on population control, inaction of bangldeshi, inaction on goraksha, inaction on RJB , inaction on missionaries etc etc.
.
NaMo's psuedo-hinduvaad is now visible. But if you cite issues like RJB, bangladeshi, population control etc, then NaMo-andhbhagats have invalid but valid sounding excuses - 2.5 years isnt enough and NaMo is doing something, NaMo is doing something !!! The excuses are all false, but they sound valid. So a less informed hindu gets convinced that NaMo is hinduvaadi.
.
So pls start with govt control over hindu temples. On this action, the excuse that "2.5 years isnt enough" will NOT sound valid to any hindu. Because if NaMo and other BJP state CMs were even 1% sincere, then govt control over temples would have ended within 3 months.
.
So pls start with argument that "the fact that NaMo is opposing the proposals to remove govt control over temples proves that NaMo is psuedo-hinduvaadi ?". That will convince even a less informed Hindu that NaMo is anti-Hindu. Now RSS-workers cant say that "2.5 years arent enough to remove govt control". If RSS-workers make such argument, then even a less informed Hindu will dismiss that argument as false.
.