Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate

Why are people in Pakistan more anti-Missionaries then people in India ?
.
Portugese entered Japan some 20 years after they found Goa and were able to convert a few Japanese. After that, there was a rebellion and the then rulers blamed Missionaries for that rebellion, And after that, Japanese rulers defacto banned Missionaries and adopted a policy of isolation. The isolation policy went on till US President sent gunboats to Japan in 1850s to open up, At that time Japan had to allow Missionaries. But after WW1, Japan expelled Missionaries. But after WW2, Japan has freely allowed Missionaries.
.
Now lets compare India and Pakistan
.
Now USUK has control over Pakistani's apex heads such as Ministers, opposition leaders, judges, generals and also paidmediamen. In India, Military doesnt interfere in civil matters, And USA has control over India's apex Ministers, opposition leaders , judges and also paidmediamen,
.
In India, USUK-elitemen, using paidmediamen and leaders like SoMoKe and other CoBhAp-leaders, have been able to ensure that people accept or ignore Missionaries. and so Missionaries have been able to grow. There is no direct action against the,m from activists nor activists are working on any legislative framework to reduce their influence directly or indirectly (*). IOW, using SoMoke and paidmediamen, the USUK-elitemen have been able to convince (or fool?) activists to focus on other issues and ignore Missionaries
.
However, in Pakistan, despite spending huge money to bribe/sponsor apex leaders and buy paidmediamen, USUK-elitemen have NOT been to convince (or fool?) activists and people in Pakistan to ignore Missionaries.
.
So IYO what factors are making difference?