Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate

People of UP wasted their time and energy by giving it to BJP. Their time and energy would have yileded better results if they had spent time and money in forcing MPs to get necessary law-drafts passed, such as increasing number of courts etc etc
.
People of UP were suffering massive violence by criminals, So they spent huge amount of time, money and energy campaigning for BJP, and gave 70 MPs to BJP. And now these 70 BJP MPs are opposing law-drafts that can reduce crime. And excuse they give is --- unless you get BJP into state govt , BJP cant (read we will not) do anything !!
.
CoBhAp have striking similarity. Before election, AAP used to say that even if AAP gets one MP in Parliament, then AAP can make a lot of difference. Well AAP has 4 MPs, and none MP proposed even one private member's bill to reduce any problem of India. Now AAP says --- unless we have 273 MPs, there isnt much we can do.
.
BJP has 280 MPs. And so now excuse BJP MPs and NaMo give to people of UP is --- they need CM's chair as well !! Well, there is a lot central govt can do without CM to reduce crimes. eg Central Govt can increase number of judges to 10 times, which will reduce delay and reduce crimes,. Other law-drafts are right to recall district judge, Jury System, Grand Jury System, narco-test in public , reducing juvenile age to 14 years for serious sexual violet crimes etc. IOW, there are many law-drafts BJP MPs can pass to reduce crimes in UP without becoming CM first. But all that is NO-NO to NaMo and BJP MPs. They want CM-ship first and thereafter also there is no guarantee what-so-ever.
.
Lesson to learn is --- the activists should wasting time , money and energy in campaigning for SoMoKe (=Sonia, NaMo, AK) and CoBhApSwaRa (= Congress, BJP, AAP, Bharat Swabhiman, RSS) and instead activists should focus on law-draft which can reduce mess in India. examples of such law-drafts I would propose are TCP, RTR, JurySys, wealth tax etc etc