Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate

India's MPs passed Lokpal due to UNCAC = United Nations' Convention against Corruption, which Govt of India had signed in dec-2005 and ratified in may-2011 due to bribes and pressure MNC-owners applied on Ministers ; Anna's fasts were just farce ; Lokpal system with NO RTR Lokpal benefits foreign elitemen more than India. Solution : pls order your MP via SMS to print RTR-Lokpal clauses in the Lokpal draft.

(I have put spaces in links to circumvent a facebook problem. To see the links, pls see first comment or pls remove spaces)

Basically, the MNC-owners want such Janlokpal system in India and all countries across world where 5-12 Janlokpals have control over every Minister, MP, MLA, IAS, IPS etc. And so by controlling merely 5-12 Janlokpals, the MNC-owners seated in Londan\NYC can control whole of Indian administration. Later on google, I found UNCAC. Indian Ministers signed UNCAC in dec-2005 and ratified UNCAC on 15-may-2011 . This meant that India had no option but to pass Lokpal bill sooner or later. UNCAC is legally binding on countries which sign it . Now pls see article-6 of UNCAC at unodc . org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/Publications/Convention/08-50026_E.pdf . article-6 says

===

UNCAC-Article 6. Preventive anti-corruption body or bodies

(6.1) Each State Party shall, in accordance with the fundamental principles of its legal system, ensure the existence of a body or bodies, as appropriate, that prevent corruption by such means as:

(6.1.a) Implementing the policies referred to in article 5 of this Convention and, where appropriate, overseeing and coordinating the implementation of those policies;

(6.1.b) Increasing and disseminating knowledge about the prevention of corruption.

(6.2) Each State Party shall grant the body or bodies referred to in paragraph-1 of this article the necessary independence, in accordance with the fundamental principles of its legal system, to enable the body or bodies to carry out its or their functions effectively and free from any undue influence. The necessary material resources and specialized staff, as well as the training that such staff may require to carry out their functions, should be provided.

======

Now pls see wiki page on UNCAC. It will show that UNCAC is legally binding !! Now UNCAC doesnt use the word Lokpal per se. But it uses the word "appointed body", which means authorities cant be elected and need to be appointed. And UNCAC uses words "necessary independence" which means that Ministers should have no powers to expel/transfer them after they are appointed. This will make Lokpals immune to citizens' wrath as well. And thus these "independent Lokpals" can sell themselves to the highest bidders or most powerful entity namely MNC-owners themselves. Or better, MNC-owners can plant men loyal to them as Lokpals and control Ministers via Lokpals.

Now it would have looked very insulting on all MPs across parties if citizens would have seen that Lokpal came due to UNCAC. And so a mass movement was faked to create a show that "MPs brought Lokpal under voters' pressure" !!!

For details, pls see chap-45 of rahulmehta . com/301.htm . You may also pls see my videos at youtube . com /user/MehtaRahulC/videos and youtube . com /user/RightToRecallGroup/search?query=Lokpal . In addition, you may see the notes on Lokpal at facebook . com/groups/rrgindia/ , and notes in facebook . com/note.php ?note_id=10150422423416922 . Some videos are over 2 years old , some 1 year old etc where I have spoken about UNCAC's diktat to Indian Govt to enact Lokpal type law.

If Anna of AK were independent concerned activists, they none would have oppose the proposal to print "Right to Recall Janlokpal clauses" in Janlokpal draft. No committed activist would ever oppose the proposal to give power to people of India to expel Janlokpal if the Janlokpal were to become corrupt or worse and MNC-agent. They both opposed it ONLY because they knew that if they were to support "Right to Recall Janlokpal clauses" then Ford Foundation would be very upset and may pull the plug on them, and they would lose all publicity they have obtained.

Pls search on word "asset" in the UNCAC-draft. You will see sections on asset recovery i.e. person who took bribe can be forced to repay the bribes. The clauses related to asset recovery in Janlokpal as well as Govt-Lokpal BOTH come from UNCAC only.

All in all, Lokpal movement was all creation of MNC-owners and their paid-media. And once MNC-owners manage to plant their men like Santosh Hegde on the seats of Lokpals, their control will further increase. Soon, MMS will appoint 5-8 MNC-agents as Lokpals, and so even if handful of Swadeshi, Nationalists and Hinduvaadies win in may-2014 Loksabha elections, then Lokpals can easily control and neutralize them.

Solution I propose is that we should try to get Right to Recall Lokpal clauses printed in the Lokpal draft. For the DRAFT, pls see chap-45 of rahulmehta