Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate
AAP = AK is likely to get about 20% of polled votes i.e. about 120 lakhs * 67% polled votes * 20% AAP votes = about 16 lakhs votes which is HUGE success. Whether they get 5 seats or 20 seats is an additional success. But all in all, AAP = AK has wasted activists' precious time and nation has lost badly because delay in efforts needed to improve law of the land . It is a great success for MNC-owners and loss for India.
Solution ? Explain voters what laws we need and request them to send orders to MPs via SMS to print these laws.
=====
In almost every way, India is behind USA. Is it because we dont care? NO, we do care. . India has as many of volunteers who care as USA. But India is lagging behind ONLY because Indian volunteers have tendency to become andh-bhagats like becoming andh-bhagat of Duratma Gandhi or Anna and now Arvind Gandhi. While volunteers in USA as I observed and studied always rallied behind a law-draft that they think would improve their country. They never took the "leader" even as a guide.
Why is this tendency to look for a tall leader exists in India and not in West ? I will some day explain in detail that this tendency comes from ONE and ONLY one reason. That in 1000 BC , European settlements such as Greece etc decided to pick 50-100 citizens at random to decide if a person should be punished or not ; while back then, the Indian villages decided to pick "a good human being" to decide punishments !!! Some day, I will show that ALL differences between west and east come from this main reason and no other reason. And today this tendency to look for "a good human being" remains, NOT because of culture, but because activists dont have information that better way to decide punishments is to select 50-100 voters at random. i.e. problem why we are behind USA is only lack of information, not culture.
But as long as lack of this specific information remains, the British and now MNC-owners exploit this tendency to look for 1000 feet tall leader aka Kalki beautiful. They see that many Indian volunteers will rally behind a 1000 ft tall leader aka Kalki and never go after an idea given by 5 ft to 7 ft tall human. Now no human is taller than 7 ft. So only way, one can be made to look 1000 ft tall leader is via paid-media. And thats what British did in 1910 --- using paid-media they convinced many volunteers that Duratma Gandhi was 1000 ft tall leader aka Kalki, and so many activists fell for it. And even today, via paid-media, the MNC-owners and Missionaries could convince that Anna and now Arvind Gandhi are 1000 ft tall leaders and so activists are falling for him, and wasting time.
Please note that I have NO regret for votes BJP lost. In fact, BJP may lose about 3 crore middle class voters in may-2014 Loksabha elections to AAP, and I will have no regrets. In politics, every newcomer will cut someone's votes. I dont take that as a reason to curse newcomer. I also contest elections, and who knows how many votes did I cut of whom. And voters are not any big party's private property. But question is --- what good or damage that newcomer did?
AAP = AK is worse than Congress + BJP. Congress + BJP are corrupt. And lot of activists see that solution is not new set of MPs but new laws. They do not know which laws, but they know that solution is law-change. These activists and their hours are the ONLY hope I see for India.
Now Congress + BJP tell these activists to get lost. And so Congress + BJP dont wasting away this medicine. While AAP = AK lied to these activists. AAP = AK via paid-media fooled and convinced these activists that AAP = AK wants to brings new laws in India, whereas AK= AAP never wanted to bring any good laws in India. Their "Janlokpal with NO RTR-Janlokpal clauses" was one of the most pro-MNC-law one can make in India. The AK lied to activists that he wants to bring Right to Recall laws in India in apr-2011, and now 2.5 years later, he says that he has no draft !!
What did nation lose ?
1. The biggest damage AK did was that he deliberately took Janlokpal movement to dead end, and he killed the movement so that he can rationalize his goal of creating his political party. It is NOT that mass-movement is a flawed concept. the reality was that --- AK and his MNC-sponsors only wanted a new party and never wanted mass movement to succeed.
2. Most The activists were all unpaid, committed, spending their own money . They could have been used for national interest --- inform citizens that Indian Military is weakening, Bangladeshi infiltration, poverty, worsening education, increasing MNC-domination etc etc. And their time could have beed used to raise a TRUE mass movement. But AK wasted away their time vote generation, cap wearing, slogan shouting, rallying etc.
===
AAP = AK via paid-media convinced activists that AAP's MLAs and MPs will not sell out like BJP\Congress MLAs and MPs even though there is NO RTR-MP and RTR-MLA. This was a classic nonsense. No matter which and how 70 new MLAs or 550 new MPs you get from planet or universe, in absence of Right to recall , they will all sell out. And AAP = AK fooled activists that his MLAs will pass RTR. And later he changed that he will pass RTR only after he gets 51% majority in Loksabha and then Yogendra Yadav said that they will pass RTR after they have 67% majority in both houses !!
All in all AAP = AK consumed committed activities and crores of activist hours, and created one more Congress as if country didnt have enough Congress like parties. And there is NOTHING to his success. AK is a great actor, but set around him was created by paid-media funded by MNC-owners and Missionaries. AK is just like Duratma Gandhi. Duratma Gandhi was a great actor, but nothing more. And back then , British paid Duartma Gandhi via Tata, Birla , Dalmia, Sarabhai , Bajaj etc so that Duratma Gandhi can setup Ashrams and waste away volunteers' hours into bhajan singing and charkha-spinning, And British paid mediamen to project Gandhi so that volunteers would come to him and waste away all the time. many activists got fooled by same techniques again. MNC-owners paid media to project AK as 1000 ft tall leader. And many volunteers who were in reality looking for system change fell for him.
====
Solution?
Solution I propose is that we explain law-drafts by which we can improve India. And then we convince activists to work to convince 40 crore voters to send orders to MPs via SMS to get these law-drafts passed.