Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate
As communication grows, the method of "divide activists using existing animosity and rule" seems to be obsolete. The new methods since 1900 AD seem to be (a) divide activists by creating and giving fame to psudo-alternative leaders and rule (b) confuse activists and rule and (c) misguide activists and rule (d)overload with information, but suppress information on key points . Solution I propose is to propose administrative solutions, avoid analysis of problem and confine to analysis of proposed solutions and inform activists about the solutions their leader opposes.
The enemy, namely MNC-owners and Missionaries, and also Indian Elitemen seem to have graduated to new levels. The age old methods was to use raw armies, and enemies didnt have control over local mediamen to twist polity. In fact, bulk of media was word of mouth, which cannot be manipulated by bribing 0.01% population. But with arrival of newspapers and TV-channels, it became possible to influence news and views by bribing just 0.001% population namely media-owners and journalists. So by paying journalists and media-owners, the enemy nations seems to have devised new methods not used till 1900 AD in world.
The methods are
1. create pseudo-alterative and make them famous : eg British paid mediamen to give fame Duratma Gandhi to cut influence of Mahatma Lajpat Rai, Mahatma Bhagat Singh, Mahatma Sanyal, Rashtrapita Mahatma Subhashchandra Bose etc etc. And British also funded Duratma's Ashrams so that Duratma Gandhi can keep activists into bhajan singing, charkha spinning etc. Several pseudo-alteratives have been created since then. Chiranjeev, Maharashtra Nav Nirman Sena etc. And latest being Anna to cut influence of Swami Ramdevji, and Arvind Ghandy aka Arvind Gandhi, Anna etc to cut NaMo votes etc
2. confuse activists --- one of the biggest confusion is via reserve bank of India. Next comes economists, who have theories which assume that Militaries and Natural Resources play no role in economy. In fact, most economic theories give zero value to natural resources. eg when USA looted all Iraqi oil below the ground, all economists agreed that there was zero capital addition to assets of American companies !!! IOW, by creating political\economic theories that hide most important aspect in economy, namely Military and Natural resources
3. Misguide activists ---
4. Overload of information , but suppressing key information : I re-glanced 500+ pages of Samuleson's economics textbook. There was NO reference to progressive tax, regressive tax, flat tax and no comparison between taxes such as VAT, Sales Tax, Inheritance Tax, Wealth Tax, Income Tax etc. IOW, whole body of knowledge that Sales Tax increase poverty and reduce industrial efficienies and Inheritance\Wealth tax reduce poverty and increase efficency was not there. Likewise, textbooks of Political Science in India give huge amount of information on USA , but say NOTHING on Jury System, Right to recall, Wealth Tax and Inheritance which are 4 most important differences between USA's system and India's system. Indian History books never talk why East India Company Directors ordered to stop use of buffalo fat in bullets and instead use cow\pig fat mix in bullets in around 1853-1854 !! This hides information about important role religion play in everything - politics, economics and above all war and Military.
Not everything is done by foreigners. eg It is Indian elitemen who decided to hide information on RTR, Jury System , Wealth Tax, Inheritance tax etc.
====
Solutions I propose :
1. Avoid discussion on problem, and DIRECTLY start with administrative proposals to reduce problems, and confine analysis to comparing effects and efficiencies of the proposed solutions. This kill all false theories.
2. How to reduce influence of pseudo-alternative-leaders? Inform activists about solutions, and also inform that their leaders are opposing these solutions, and hence convince them that "daal mein kaalaa hei".
eg Paid-media convinced all activists that Arvindbhai is new Mahatma Bhagat Singh. But when I informed activists that Arvindbhai has opposed Right to Recall Janlokpal clauses, many activists started doubting it. And finally, when the activists came to know that Arvindbhai opposes wealth tax, opposes listing plots charities own on net, opposes death sentence to juvenile murderer in dec-16 delhi bus case, supports supreme's dance bar judgment etc etc, many activists got convinced that Arvindbhai is Duratma Gandhi, and not of Mahatma Bhagat Singh.
But pls note that any amount of fault finding would not have helped. Only "confronting with alternative legal\administrative proposals" helped in exposing Arvind Gandhi. Eben you show faults in leaders' statements, it will only lead to endless debates.