Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate

Gish Gallop - why written debates are better than oral
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
.
In oral debates, the unethical person can use gish gallop tactic and opponent will never have time to reply

This is why awaken , ULM , sakha and many only wanted oral debates. And they refused to QA on FB using 2 person threads.

In gish galloping , the unethical person A can put several false sentences , which media has projected as truth , one after another.
.
Now each sentence can be shown as false to audience by B. But B needs 10s of minutes. And oral debates have strong time limits.
.
In written QA , the gish galloper will get fully exposed. Say A uses gish galloping. Say A writes 10 false sentences. Now B can show that 2 sentences are false using required lengthy posts. And then ask audience to ask A to retract his false sentences. Whether A retracts or not, A is exposed before audience.
.
So in written debates , gish galloper will get exposed. But oral debates , he will win !!! So written debates are good for ethical people and oral are good only for unethical people.