Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate
Decide which of the two stories are true -
.
(a) RSS-leaders NaMo / Katter did NOT know the judgment and did not say anything to Guru Ram Rahimji in private what judgment would be . NaMo / Katter merely did heir constitutional duties and stayed away.
.
(b) RSS-leaders NaMo / Katter knew that judgement is against Sri Guru Ram Rahimji (thru their trusted men aka spies in CBI court or other means such as raw / IB etc ) and then lied (YES , LIED) to Sri Guru Ram Rahimji that he will be acquitted !! This was done so that Ram Rahimji comes to Panchkula. Because if Ram Rahimji could have asked that he will attend Sirsa Court and let judge give judgment via video conference. Then arresting him in Sirsa would have been difficult. And so RSS-leaders NaMo / Khatter told Ram Rahimji that the will be acquitted
.
Each one can decide which is true and false.
.
----
.
My IQ is 107. And I think (2) is true. Because I dont think that congress / rss / aap leaders really respect constutional boundaries and will not put spies in courts in such high profile case. So all the "constitutional duties" gibberish doesnt fit in my small brain. And if this is true, this is a case of backstabbing, Because DSS had helped RSS in Loksabha-2014 elections as well as Haryana Assembly assembly elections. Without Dalit / Jat support, RSS could have NEVER won Haryana assembly election. RSS wanted a non-Jat CM and so taking support from Dalits was must. DSS used to support congress, but this time, they had supported RSS (though in Punjab Assenbly, they supported Congress and opposed RSS).
.
Backtsabbing in Indian (or any country) politcs of past 10000 years is routine, Congress does it, rss does it and do does aap;. So a note to activists is --- backstabbing was there, and is still there.
.
But question is --- why did RSS-leaders Khatter / NaMo fooled Gruru Ram rahimji and convinced him to come to Panchkula?
.
Dig deeper, and you get more dirt.
--------
.
So each one can decide which possibility is true and false. And then decide whether politics involve following constitutional duties or raw backtsabbing, And if and when backstabbing happens, why it happens.