Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate

Retired Judges in Law Commission India 1958 had demanded ending Jury System !!! Hence Nanavati case which happened in nov-1959, had NOTHING to do with ending of JurySys in India !!
.
(An excellent find by RTR activist Anil Shaw. While CoBhApSwaRa-workers and SoMoKe-andhbhagats confine to slogan shouting and netapuja , our RTR activists do serious readings. So Anil Shaw was gathering all articles on JurySys written in India before 1960, and he found and downloaded 14th Law Commission Report and found chapter on JurySys. And fining was NOT easy, because the the pdf of 14th Law Commission Report 1958 is NOT text pdf but a scanned JPGs. So cnttl-F aka textfind will NOT work and one has to manually read all lines !!! So it Anil Shaw had to spend a lot of time in digging out this fact that decision to end JurySys was taken at least 1-2 years before Nanavati case happened !! ).
.
Pls download chap-42 of 14th Law Commission 1958 at https://www.facebook.com/groups/rrgindia/1097138050335635/ ,.
.
It is chap-42, some 10 pages from page# 864 to page# 873 .
.
In this chapter, retired apex judges who had formed Law Commission, had recommended ending JurySys in India in 1958 itself !!
.
It is easy to see why these corrupt, nepotic, nexused judges wanted end to JurySys in India. Ending JurySys would increase their incomes. Also, Juries were acting against criminals hired by landlords and thus making it difficult for landlords to sabotage land reforms. And so ending JurySys had become a must.
.
Across world. "intellectuals" have ALWAYS opposed JurySys. eg Socrates, Artistottle and Plato were all against JurySys and supported oligarchies and monarchies . The way it works as --- elitemen spend huge bucks to publicize those who oppose Jury System , Right to Recall etc. And so leaders like SoMoKe or intellectuals like Socrates , Plato, Aristottle etc see which side bread gets butters and so they start opposing Jury System, RTR etc.
.
So even in 600 BC, Greek elitemen and Greek intellectuals opposed their JurySys. And when JurySys restarted in UK in 950 AD, the then elitemen, kings, lords and paidintellectuals started opposing it. In USA too, all paidintellectuals have always opposed it. And same happened in India - every paidintellectual and every elitemen in India had started oppposing JurySys ever since it came in 1830s.
.
Then how come JurySys survived in UK, USA etc and died in India?
.
Because in those countries, activists worked to inform citizens to inform them about demerits of judge system and merits of Jury System. Whereas activists in India decided to become andhbhagats of some apex leaders. So Jury System survived in those countries, and died in India.
.
SOLUTION?
.
Solution I propose to all REAL nationalists in India is to dump all SoMoKe-andhbhagats, unfollow their facebook profiles and instead work to publicize Jury System and other law drafts. These andhbhagats will never work to improve laws in India. Only activists who are publicizing law-drafts will be able to make some differece.
.
So pls unfollow all SoMoKe-andbhagats and pls work to publicize Jury System law-draft.