Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate

In US-elitemen, like elitemen across world and time, want weaponless commons so that mass extortion via banking , regressive taxes etc will not cause rebellion. And so the elitemen pay mediamen to higlight the guns' minus points 100 times and hide the plus point of mass gun ownership.
.
Every medicine has side-effects. And if one highlights only the side-effects and hides the benefits, then every medicine will look evil. One can make bomb out of fertilizers. So should fertlizers be banned? One can use mining explosives to kill people in cities. So should miners be banned from using explosives? The list is endless.
.
The biggest PLUS point of weaponized citizenry is freedom and liberty itself !!! Yes, the so called freedom started ONLY after European Kings and Priests were left with no option but to weaponize masses to deal with Islamic invaders in 900 AD onwards. There are other factors too -- such as Jury System which started in 950 AD. But one reason why Kings had to adopt JurySys was weaponization of the commons.
.
The kings, the priests and their officers were reckless, and everything went fine because commons were weaponless. But to fight against islamic invaders, kings and priests had to weaponize more and more and more commons. And so commons also started using weapons when king's officers or priests would act recklessly. So to reduce the recklessness of officers, the UK Kings in 950 AD introduced so called Coronor's Jury System, which later forced Kings to sign Magna Carta in which Kings were forced to accept Jury Trial in all cases. And then came liberty, freedom and industrial growth. And none of this would have happened if commons were kept unarmed.
.
Lets compare India of 600 AD to 1700 AD with Europe. The kings and priests in India refused to give weapons to commons, and so islamist invaders won Afghanistan, then Pakistan then almost whole of India and so on. And a turn around started ONLY when leaders like Shivaji, and Guru Gobind Singh decided to weaponize commons. And Guru Gobind Singh did a better job than Shivaji, by making weaponization of commons as a religious duty, and so Sikhs could do a better job at repelling islamists than maratha, But if weaponization of commons had not been started by Shivaji or Guru Gobind Singh, then whole of India would have fallen to Islamists by 1700 AD.
.
IOW, if commons in Europe in 900 AD were kept weaponless, then Islamists would have captured WHOLE of Europe . It is weaponization of commons, which saved Europe from Islamist takeover.
.
Surely, paidhistorians and paid-political-science-professors never told you all this. Why? Because the elitemen have paid them not to say so.
.
The elitemen in USA, just like elitemen across world and across time want to extort commons using control over minerals, control over govt lands, regressive taxes and new tool called "banking". Such techniques often causes rebellion (please google on Whiskey Rebellion in USA, where commons killed 10s of tax officers who were out to impose regressive tax like excise on liquor). The weaponized citizenry forces elitemen to backtrack. And so elitemen want to deweaponize the commons of USA..
.
The paidmediamen are ALL pet puppies of elitemen. They feed on bread crumbs that the elitemen throw at them. And so paidmediamen, along with paidhistorians and paid-political-science-professors have covered the plus points of weaponization of commons and insist on covering minus points with 100 times the weight.
.
Even today, in USA, guns saves 10000s of lives every year, because criminals keep themselves away from commons because commons have guns. The paidmediamen will never show the lives that guns saved.
.
As per the recent killing of 50 gays by Afghan --- the problem is NOT guns, but US \ Europe policy of inviting immigrants from Afghanistan, pakistan etc. There are lakhs of immigrants from India in USA and most of them dislike gays,. But how many of them resorted to killings? NONE !! All they do is -- stay away. IOW, the problem is importing immigrants from Afghanistan and Pakistan. Not guns. And in many cases, islamist tendencies are also reason --- but not here. This person was just a "kill people I dont like" type person that you find dime a dozen in Pakistan or Afghanistan. They simply dont understand that "if you dont like a person, just stay away from him and dont resort to killing".
.
Those who say "ban guns because one gunman killed 50" will also say "chop hands of all men because some men beat their wives" !!! All this skewed logic is because one sided coverage given by paidmediamen because elitemen want de-weaponized docile citizenry.
.
SOLUTION?
.
The activists of USA can figure out their solutions.
.
As far as India goes, I would request activists to oppose Congress/BJP/AAP/RSS/BST workers because ALL of them oppose weaponization of commons !! Yes, RSS-workers have opposed the proposal of enabling every Indian to bear guns. RSS-workers insist that ONLY lathi should be taught. NaMo / ABV both opposes mass gun trainning to citizens. In Russia and China, communist supported mass weapon trainning though opposed mass weapon bearing. But in India, CPM has opposed mass weapon trainning as well !! In India, there is ONE and ONLY ONE political party which supports weaponization of us commons --- Right to Recall Party (to be registered). So I would request activists of India to work with Right to Recall party, and NOT with Congress/BJP/AAP/RSS/BST. And please inform citizens of India about plus points of weaponized citizenry.