Pawan Jury BhilwaraRj

Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta
5 hrs ·

1. proof that paid-media is giving ample coverage to Arvind Gandhi.
.
2. proof that paid-ToI is NOT anti-NaMo, and only is also hand in glove with NaMo.
.
1. AAPians are posting fake complaints that paid-media is not reporting them. Well, please see epaper of yesterday's Hindustan Times, Delhi edition, front page and then page-2. The front page has link to page-2 news of AK vacating the Govt flat he was given and moving to Kaushambi. And page-2 has some 1/8 page size news on same. IOW, someone is constantly paying mediamen to keep AK in news. Now AAPians may wish that WHOLE newspaper should be on AK and anything less is ignoring them. But thats AAP standard. The general standard is --- if major newspapers are giving 3 mentions per day, then that is sufficient coverage to keep AAP = AK in circulation. And AAP is getting more than enough paid-media coverage.
.
2. ToI , IE etc refused to print the news some 4 days ago, farmers in AP/Telangana threw away over 400 tonnes of tomatoes to protest against tomato wholesale buyers decision to decrease wholesale price from Rs 10 per kg to Rs 8 per kg !!! Only Sunday Gaurdian covered this news !! The reason for price difference is that inter-state vegetable movement needs Govt licenses and it is given only to traders close to BJP\Congress Ministers. And paid-media is hiding all reasons, and instead passing the blame on rain, lack of trains, lack of trucks etc etc.This shows that ToI , IE etc were never anti-NaMom and their anti-NaMo posture was only a drama