Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate

1. My reasons on why NaMo\AK both agreed with Sonia's proposal to suppress religion\language data in census-2011 data
.
2. Over all campaigns
.
'NaMo = 5% reality + 60% exaggeration + 35% suppression of ugly truths
.
AK = 0% reality + 70% exaggeration + 30% suppression of ugly truths
.
Congress = 30% (negative) reality + 0% exaggeration + 70% suppression of truth ; exaggeration could NOT have worked at all , and while lot of scams came in public, lot more scams didnt came in light
.
3. Over 3 years of volunteers time got wasted in AK-bhkati and NaMo-bhakti. i.e. crores of activist-hours were NOT used to inform voters about law-drafts, but just cap-wearing and mask-wearing !! Not spending time on publicizing law-drafts will only benefit our enemies.
.
4. Swami Ramdevji and NaMo both seem to have given up "stop Mauritius route" proposal. IMO, we recallists should step up this demand with whatever tiny resources and volunteer base we have, We can succeed, but we must try. Now of course, And even if we succeed, we will lose time, money and paid-media will give credit only to tall leaders. But then also we must try.
.
================

1. No one knows what census-2011 is. Some say that census-2011 shows that Muslim % has increased from 13,5% to 18^, Christian from 2% to 7% and Hindus from 83.5% to 75% from 2001 to 2011. AGAIN, THESE ARE RUMORS, No one has data. And may be now, data is all tempered in 2 years, If this data comes, there will be a strong Hinduvaadi current which would make Sonia and AK lose. So Sonia suppressed data and AK supported the data supression, But why did NaMo supported Sonia in suppressing census-2011 data?
.
Again, no one knows. Only NaMo can tell. But one set of rumors say that Muslim % in Gujarat has increased from 9% to 12% and Christian from 2% to 6% and Hindu from 89% to 82% !! And if 6% say that they are Christian, then actual count could be 8% to 90% which takes Hindu count from 89% in 2001 to well 79% !! IOW, even though Hindu would have felt, they would have (rughtly?) seen that Modivaad is NOT the answer. IOW, NaMo would have lost is "all is well in Modraaj" , "NaMo is superman" and "NaMo is flawless" image.This would have reduced his support in his activists as well as voters.
.
So NaMo had no option but to accept Sonia's proposal to suppress census-2011 data. Again, these are the reasons I give,. Only NaMo knows his reasons. You can also make your guesses
.
=====
.
2. NaMo is least bad = best of all CMs and Central Ministers. But campaign was full of exaggerations. And many ugly facts, which could have dented NaMo's image, were suppressed. I have cited a long list of ugly facts in previous posts. some examples are --- NaMo didnt demand census-2011 data, NaMo pushed KVD and KJBD under the carpet, NaMo's GST can jkill small factory/business owners , NaMo is supporting Mauritius route etc etc. Media-owners must have charged a hell lot of money for reporting all exaggeration and suppression of facts. But 5% of campaign was reality eg roads, electricity, factories in Gujarat are less bad than rest states.
.
AK is 0% reality and all 100^ exaggeration of paid-media only. And many ugly facts which would have gone against AK were suppressed.(eg AK has never give RTR-drafts, AK never gives credit to RTR to even Chandrashekhar Azad etc)
.
Paid-media did report some crimes of MMS\Sonia etc such as coal-gate, 2G etc. But serious crimes never came into newspapers !! eg worst crime Congress did in past 5 years was NOT 2G or coal, but spression of census-2011 data,. No newspaper reported it and not even RSS-apex or BJP-apex dared to report this to general public, And another equally worse crime Congress had done was Bangladeshi infiltration, Now Congress, Sonia , MMS image was so bad, that exaggeration was not possible,
.
All in all, this campaign was "too much talks , but no real talk" . The social media too confined 95% to cap wearing, mask wearing, slogan shouting etc and real issues like suppression of census-2011 data, Bangladeshi, poverty, weakening of Indian Military etc didnt get much coverage.
.
======
.
3. Except recallists, most activists , particularly AK-andh-bhagats and NaMo-andh-bhagats think that a tall leader is all that India needs and no good law-drafts are needed,. Finally, when importance of law-drafts was explained to them, they said "for next 3 years, we will do only neta-pooja ; after may-2014 we may campaign for good law-drafts". Well folks, election time is when voters are interested in listening, If you talk about law-drafts AFTER elections, then you are talking to less than 5% of voters would show interest,. As saying goes, "sell umbrella when it rains". If you have a new design for umbrella (law-drafts) and you want voters to at least notice it, then best time is to show it when it rains, If you hide that umbrella when it rains, and show it later, then , not even 1% potential umbrella users will notice,
.
So activists have wasted away 3 years in neta-bhakti. Everyday we live without good law-draft, is a day enemy gains an inch over us. All this slogan shouting, cap wearing, mask wearing etc is cool and fun, if we dont have enemies to worry about. But we do have ebemies like USA, UK, China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Bangladesh. And in such situation, your ignoring away law-drafts during election timehas drastically delayed the possibility of getting these law-drafts passed.
.
=====
.
4. Since mar-2014 , Swami Ramdevji hasnt given any demand to cancel mauritius route, He could not force BJP to add this in BJOP manifesto. NaMo hasnt mentioned even the word Mauritius in Modifesto, The real beneficiary of Mauritius route are NOT Indians, bur foreign elitemen who now own much of paid-media in India. I dont see any hope that Swami Ramdevji or NaMo will take that issue. AK depends on same foreign elitemen and he too asked volunteers to igniore mauritius route issue. Most volunteers of BST, RSS\BJP, AAP will go with their leaders demand to ignore mauritius route .So we recallists are on our own. We are too small in numbers. And IMO, we will fail, and worse, if we succeed, then also we will suffer losses, then eventually ONLY the tall leaders will get credit. But IMO , then also, we must try,
.
I will prepare a newspaper advt on taxation issues, and Mauritius route.