Rahul Mehta Gandhinagar LsCandidate
Many people ask me WRONG question why I oppose AK and not NaMo. Because I have opposed NaMo 10s of times, such as his ditching Ram Janam Bhoomi, his Sb4D statement, his climbdown on art-370 , his giving Sardar statue contract to foreign company, NaMo silence on scensus-2011 data and many more.
So same people then ask me question --- why I oppose AK more than NaMo ?
Well, say you enter a South Indian restaurant owner , give owner Rs 200 and ask for a Punjabi food say palak paneer. The restaurant owner returns you Rs 200 and says "sorry sir, we dont make palak paneer , pls try another shop". Then you go to a Punjabi restaurant owner and give him Rs 200 and ask for palak paneer . He promises you best palak paneer , takes your Rs 200 and then he never shows up for weeks and months .
So my point is --- (1) you want system change aka palak paneer in this example (2) NaMo is like South Indian restraint owner who told you on day one that "sorry I dont deliver system change ; I will do what I can in this system" (3) AK promised you system change such as Right to Recall Mayor, RTR Corporator etc etc and so many activists gave him time, money, energy etc. And he now opposes system change. And now he opposes RTR-Delhi-Mayor, RTR-Delji-Jalboard-Chairman, RTR-Delhi-District-Education-Officer,
Now he is cheat?
AAP got donations of Rs 20 crore. And nothing wrong with it -- its all 100% white money and came from ordinary voters and bonafide NRIs. May god give AAP Rs 200 crore. But of this, some 75% came for Right to Recall. And now AK is opposing RTR-Mayor, will it refund that money?
And forget money. Some 75% AAP activists gave hours for RTR-Mayor that AK had promised on apr-2011. Can that lost time be recovered.
Now my focus is getting good laws in India, NaMo neither helps, nor he is obstacle. While AK is ruining it by consuming and wasting away time of activists who want system change. So yes, I see AK as liar, cheat and nuisance, while NaMo is just an uninterested bystander.
Now, if youare AK-bhagats, can YOU answer to people of India why AK is supporting Bangladeshies? Why is he opposing law against Go Hatya in Delhi? why is he NOT taking steps to ban illegal slaughter houses? Why is AK opposing proposal to put all trusts' assets on net? What has NaMo got to do with all this? Is NaMo stopping AK now? The reason is AK's nefarious links with Saudies and Missionaries who pay for his paid-media coverage. So how is NaMo coming into all this? IOW, these are AK's problems. When NaMo does something wrong (like ditching Ram Janambhoomi +Devalaya issue), I will surely criticize him. But all these issues are related with AK only.